Daily Advertiser letters: Bourke Street rough as, repairs a waste of time

The upgrade of road surface along Macleay Street is smooth and beautiful to drive on.

Bourke Street is rough as you know what!! Seems a waste of time!!

Talk about the pot calling the kettle black! The opinion piece correspondent in The Daily Advertiser on July 28 ("'No' campaign tactics straight out of the Trump playbook") says that the No voters are using emotive language.

Does he not realise that the Yes camp holds the copyright on emotive language?

Let me give you some examples of what the leading spokespersons are saying: this is nation building, it is the right thing to do, it makes the nation look better on the world stage, it is in the spirit of unity, it is for a better future, it is a modest change.

These pearls of wisdom may give one a warm and fuzzy feeling.

However, when running the country or changing the constitution, these pearls of wisdom and warm and fuzzy feelings just do not cut the mustard.

It is 13 years since the Murray-Darling Basin Plan was legislated, and at the time concern was expressed by many who live in the Southern Basin that this was flawed legislation which would always be problematic.

Some water ministers were able to 'kick the can down the road', rather than acknowledge the flaws and work with communities to fix them.

The current water minister, Tanya Plibersek, has been forced to concede the plan cannot be completed by the original deadline of June 2024.

It's strange that many government projects are not finished on time, and this is accepted, yet for years we've been told the Basin Plan must be finished 'in full and on time'.

For the past 12 months Labor has blamed the Coalition for the delays, but this is a cop-out.

The delays have been caused by a last minute change which added 450 gigalitres to the recovery target (due to a South Australian blackmail), yet with no plan to deliver the additional volumes. And let's not forget, this was a Labor change that was included for political purposes, not environmental ones.

That has left us in a position where there are significant unanswered questions around this 450GL.

Most importantly, even if the additional water is recovered, our river system does not have the capacity to deliver it from the dams to the end of the system. It's like trying to fit 10 litres of water into a 5 litre bucket ... it won't fit!

Additionally, if we try to recover water through buybacks it will come at a massive cost to the Australian taxpayer, with estimates of well over $10 billion, while also sacrificing the social and economic fabric of rural communities. This is not speculation; it is proven fact backed up by the MDBA's own economic analysis.

We perhaps also shouldn't forget that it will put a further cost burden on Australian families, because with less water our nation's major food bowl will produce less food. As we have seen in recent times, reducing supply bumps up the price at the supermarket.

What we need is a comprehensive review of the Basin Plan, in particular the volumes that have been recovered to date, the environmental positives that have been achieved and what volumes can we send down the Murray River and its tributaries without damaging the very rivers we are supposed to be protecting.

If we change the narrative and prioritise achieving the best possible Basin Plan, instead of political objectives, future generations will look back and applaud the vision. If we continue on the current trajectory, they'll look back in disbelief at the absolute stupidity of our governments.

HAVE YOUR SAY: Do you have something to get off your chest? Simply click here to send a letter to the editor.

Our journalists work hard to provide local, up-to-date news to the community. This is how you can continue to access our trusted content: